Web Survey Bibliography
Several recent research articles explore the impact of panel sourcing on speeding, fraudulent respondents, and participant engagement. A large number of studies have explored differential cross-cultural responses to survey design and its effect on participant engagement. Very little is understood about the impact of these factors. Is it more important to focus on the quality of the survey design or the intrinsic quality of the panel? Should researchers worry more about speeders, liars, or authenticating identity? Is demographic balance of the panel or its source more important? Should researchers focus on question design to make research more engaging or the psychology of the respondent? How do all these factors vary country by country?
ESOMAR Homepage (abstract) / (full text)
Web survey bibliography - Puleston, J. (13)
- Rewarding the Truth; 2015; Puleston, J.
- Designing Bonsai Surveys: The small but perfectly formed survey experience to meet the needs of the...; 2015; Puleston, J.
- Gamification Master Class; 2013; Puleston, J.
- Online Research, Game On!; 2013; Puleston, J.
- How to calculate the length of a survey ; 2012; Puleston, J.
- Can Survey Gaming Techniques Cross Continents? Examining cross cultural reactions to creative questioning...; 2012; Puleston, J.
- Dimensions of Online Survey Data Quality What really matters?; 2012; Puleston, J., Eggers, M.
- The Game Experiments: Researching how gaming techniques can be used to improve the quality of feedback...; 2011; Sleep, D., Puleston, J.
- How far is too far: Traditional, flash and gamification interfaces, and implications for the future...; 2011; Puleston, J., Malinoff, B.
- Online Research – Game On!: A look at how gaming techniques can transform your online research; 2011; Puleston, J.
- How new engagement techniques and question approaches are revolutionizing online research data gathering...; 2010; Puleston, J.
- A look at the impact of boredom on the respondent experience; 2008; Puleston, J., Sleep, D.
- Measuring the value of respondent engagement; 2008; Puleston, J., Sleep, D.